Thursday, June 26, 2008

Megan McArdle on Gun Statistics

In the wake of the Heller case (which I think was decided correctly), I expect there will be a spate of op-eds and blog posts about gun control. Indeed, Megan McArdle has already plunged into the debate with this post on gun statistics. One of the main problems with gun control debates—which contributes to their food-fight-like nature—is that "gun control" is a hopelessly ambiguous phrase that means different things to different people. As a result, the two sides often end up talking past each other. McArdle's post mostly addresses the effects of allowing "normally law-abiding citizens" to carry handguns, but she wanders out of that sphere a few times (e.g., discussing "would-be homicides"), which muddles her argument. So I'm not entirely sure what she means by this:

It turns out that suicides and would-be homicides weren't paying much attention to the legality of their actions. It also turns out that having a gun in your hands does not seem to turn a previously law-abiding citizen into a spur-of-the-moment killer.
Lest this be construed as a broad claim that guns are benign, the following should be pointed out (over and over again): it also turns out that having a gun in your hands tends to turn previously non-lethal crimes (e.g., assaults, robberies) into spur-of-the-moment homicides. As for the arguments about gun ownership serving as a deterrent, I agree that we don't have sufficient data to definitively answer the question. But based on the limited data we do have, one side of the debate is clearly winning:
In the gun policy debate, a related claim about the benefit of widespread gun ownership is that it serves to deter burglars, and especially “hot” burglaries of occupied homes (Kleck, 1997; Kopel, 2001). This claim is based on little evidenc of any kind. The only systematic analysis of this point of which we are aware (Cook & Ludwig, 2003b) demonstrates by use of the geocoded National Crime Victimization Survey data that the individual likelihood of residential burglary or hot burglary is not reduced by living in a county with high gun prevalence. One reason may be that a high gun prevalence increases the profitability of burglary, because stolen guns are readily fenced and easier to carry than televisions and many other types of loot.
Broadly, I agree with McArdle that the available statistics on guns are pretty weak, although I'm probably more willing to draw conclusions based on the available evidence than she is. There has been statistical malpractice on both sides of the debate, to be sure (Michael Bellesiles comes to mind); but I can recognize statistical malpractice when I see it, so I'm not too worried about getting bamboozled. Speaking of statistical malpractice, what's John Lott up to these days?


Anonymous said...

"the individual likelihood of residential burglary or hot burglary is not reduced by living in a county with high gun prevalence"

That might be true nationwide, but I suspect "gun prevalance" is not the sole issue when it comes to reducing burglaries, particularly "hot" burglaries. I've lived and worked in two areas where hot/nighttime residential burglaries were almost unheard of. Both had high rates of gun ownership, but I suspect more importantly, both were in "castle doctrine" states that gave homeowners essentially carte blanche to kill a burglar in their home on sight without legal consequence, with no requirement to retreat. Texas actually permits you to shoot a burglar in the back as he flees if he's fleeing with stolen property. Many parts of the US have high rates of gun ownership but do require a homeowner or other crime victim to retreat if possible. Widespread gun ownership isn't going to deter crime much if you're likely to go to jail if you use your gun to protect yourself. Do you know of any studies comparing "castle doctrine" jurisdictions with non-CD areas that have similar rates of gun ownership?

Thach Nguyen said...

Bạn đang tự ti về kích thước cậu nhỏ? Bạn đang muốn tìm cách trị suất tinh sớm hay những phương pháp chữa bệnh suất tinh sớm? Đừng lo lắng hay đến với muathuoctot, chúng tôi sẽ tư vấn hỗ trợ các bạn nhiệt tình về những vấn đề sinh lý trên và giúp bạn keo dai thoi gian quan he
Vợ chồng bạn chưa có con, bạn được phán đoán là tinh trùng yếu? Bạn thắc mắc nen an gi de tang chat luong tinh trung ? Hãy xem qua bài viết Những loại thực phẩm làm tăng chất lượng tinh trùng.
Chúc các bạn thành công

mua thuoc tot said...

Giảm cân có nhiều cách , nhưng cách giảm cân bằng ăn các loại thức ăn được nhiều người dùng đến , món ăn giúp giảm cân, thực đơn giảm cân cấp tốc sẽ giúp bạn có được thân hình đẹp và thon gọn. Khó ngủ hiện nay đang gặp phải ở rất nhiều người , cả già và trẻ .bi kho ngu phai lam sao ? Có nhiều cách trị khó ngủ .Gan là bộ phận lọc các chất độc trong cơ thể người , chính vì vậy việc giải độc gan rất quan trọng . thuốc giải độc gan tốt sẽ giúp bạn có được gan khỏe mạnh . Collagen giúp trẻ hóa làn da và ngăn ngừa các nếp nhăn , kéo dài tuổi thanh xuân, thực phẩm có nhiều collagen sẽ giúp bạn có được làn da đẹp và trẻ mỗi ngày . Ăn các loại các thực phẩm tốt cho mắt sẽ giúp mắt sáng và khỏe mạnh hơn.

jaring pengaman said...

Nice article, thanks for the information. It's very complete information. I will bookmark for next reference
jaring futsal | jaring golf | jaring pengaman proyek |
jaring pengaman bangunan | jaring pengaman gedung

Fire Ball said...

Bạn tìm nơi mua đồ điện máy cũ? Bạn chưa biết tìm nơi nào để mua máy lạnh cũ giá rẻ, hoặc mua cho mình một chiếc tủ lạnh cũ giá rẻ tphcm. Hãy ghé qua thằng ghờm shop nơi bạn có thể tìm mua máy lạnh, tủ lạnh,... Bạn sẽ không cần tìm mua máy giặt cũ nữa. Chỉ cần đến với chúng tôi.

Hãy đến với ngôi nhà kiến thức nơi bạn tìm hiểu được những kiến thức như am pm là gì, atsm là gì, fa là gì qua chuyên mục kiến thức tổng hợp.