Saturday, July 19, 2008

Panic About Inflation

Alan Reynolds says "not to panic on inflation," which is a pretty sure sign that inflation is about to explode. In researching for my list of pundits/experts who were wrong about the housing bubble, I found that no one was more comically wrong than Alan Reynolds. For example, Reynolds wrote in the Washington Times in 2005:

In short, we are asked to worry about something that has never happened for reasons still to be coherently explained. 'Housing bubble' worrywarts have long been hopelessly confused. It would have been financially foolhardy to listen to them in 2002. It still is.
Those silly "worrywarts" and their crazy "housing bubble" conspiracies! Don't they look stupid now! Elsewhere, Reynolds ridiculed "housing bust zealots" for being "nonsensical." By any objective standard, Reynolds should not have a job as an "expert" on anything anymore. But I'm kind of glad he didn't immediately lose his job, because his archive of op-eds is a comedic goldmine. Remember, Reynolds is the person who still denies that income inequality has increased in the U.S. over the past 25 years. He's the leader of what Justin Fox aptly describes as "the strange fantasy world of income-inequality denialists." All of his feeble criticisms of the famous Picketty-Saez results have been thoroughly refuted not only by Paul Krugman, Brad DeLong, and Mark Thoma, but also by Picketty and Saez themselves. But Reynolds soldiers on, undeterred by all those pesky facts and logic-based arguments. Perhaps my favorite op-ed in his collection is the one where he tried to take on both Ed Lazear and Ben Bernanke, who had acknowledged that income inequality has, in fact, been rising. This brings new meaning to the phrase, "bringing a knife to a gunfight." But income inequality and the housing bubble aren't the only issues Reynolds knows nothing about. Regarding Hillary Clinton's proposal to freeze mortgage rates for up to 5 years, Reynolds writes:
That has to be unconstitutional—the government can't blithely rewrite the terms of two private parties' contract.
The government can actually rewrite the terms of two parties' private contract. The Contracts Clause doesn't prevent the federal government from impairing private contractual rights, so long as the federal government is acting within its constitutional authority (e.g., regulating interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause). Moreover, the Fifth Amendment due process clause only prevents the federal government from impairing private contractual rights in an "arbitrary and irrational" way (which is extremely difficult to prove). In fact, during the Great Depression, the Supreme Court in Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell upheld a state law that was very similar to Hillary's proposal, and state laws impairing private contracts face much stricter judicial scrutiny than federal laws. So add "the law" to the list of topics Reynolds knows absolutely nothing about. Amazingly, Reynolds ends one of his op-eds with this:
I sometimes wish that people who don't know what they're talking about would simply refrain from talking.
I know what you mean.

8 comments:

Alan Reynolds said...

“Reynolds is the person who still denies that income inequality has increased in the U.S. over the past 25 years.” On the contrary, the link to my 2006 paper shows I found “no clear trend toward increased inequality after 1988 in the distribution of disposable income, consumption, wages or wealth”—that’s 18 years, not 25. Nobody denies income inequality increased between 1979 and 1988. The horrific stagflation of 1978-81 slashed top (and bottom) income shares to a postwar low.

I replied to all of the mentioned critics at http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/02/19/alan-reynolds/why-change-the-subject/

I replied to Justin Fox at http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/06/the-income-ineq.html

When time allows, I may use the blog at cato.org to debunk these unexplained assertions that my old columns about housing were factually or logically incorrect. They weren’t about nationwide “bubbles” at all (in Detroit?), but about hysterical predictions that recession was imminent in 2005-2006 and about related claims that cheaper house prices would be a terrible thing (for sellers yes, for buyers no).

Economics of Contempt said...

I've read your "replies" to your critics on income inequality, and they weren't really "replies" at all. You didn't acknowledge any of the serious criticisms leveled against your confused arguments.

You're long on promises to "debunk" your critics, but short on actual debunking. I read your housing bubble columns, and they were undeniably wrong. Your argument wasn't about whether there was a national housing bubble versus regional housing bubbles. Your argument was that because there wasn't a national housing bubble, there wasn't a housing bubble, or at least not one we should be worried about (hence the "housing bubble worrywarts" comment).

For example, you wrote, "Any risk of loan defaults would be negligible. In hot spots where home prices just rose 30 percent, even an unprecedented 25 percent price drop would have no effect on a seller who held a home just one year." That was flat-out wrong. Thanks for playing.

You also wrote: "Although the overworked analogy between housing and tech stocks sounds dramatic, it is quite preposterous. 'The downside of this [housing] bubble,' said Mr. Roach last month, is 'potentially far worse than that of the equity bubble.' Really?" Again, that was wrong. The downside of the housing bubble has been worse than the tech bubble. You tried to play this off by saying that housing prices wouldn't fall as much as the price of tech stocks, but that wasn't the original argument. Either you didn't understand the original argument (more likely), or you were lying about the original argument in order to claim victory. Pick one.

The fact that you can't admit you were wrong is just pathetic. I'm willing to tolerate a wide range of ideological disagreement, but I'm not willing to tolerate Hackonomics in the service of ideology. Every time someone refers to you as an "economist," it makes me want to burn my econ degrees. Please follow your own advice, and refrain from talking about economics.

Alan Reynolds said...

Still think I was wrong about inflation going down rather than up? I shorted oil, basic materials and precious metals, and went long the dollar. One can be ideological or right, but rarely both.

PENNY STOCK INVESTMENTS said...

Yes worry about inflation.

Alan Reynolds said...

For such a harsh critic of forecasts, Economics of Contempt was sure wrong to worry about inflation in July 2008.

As for the "top 1%" data, here is a link to my 100-page reply to critics and I doubt that EofC has read it. http://www.cato.org/publications/working-paper/misuse-top-1-percent-income-shares-measure-inequality

Trần Duy Thuận said...

Trần Duy Thuận Blog đang cần nhận gia công tại nhà. Ai có cần người nhận gia công tại nhà tphcm liên hệ mình nhé. Truy cập vào đặt vé máy bay giá rẻ vietjet để có thêm kinh nghiệm khi đi máy bay nhé.

mua thuoc tot said...

Collagen là thành phần giúp da chống lại quá trình lão hóa và giúp trẻ hóa làn da những thực phẩm chứa nhiều collagen sẽ giúp bạn dể dàng bổ sung collagen vào cơ thể.Mất ngủ hiện nay đang diễn ra một cách nhanh chóng , ở mọi lứa tuổi khác nhau , bị mất ngủ phải làm sao ? Bị mất ngủ nên dùng thuốc hoặc đến gặp bác sĩ điều trị. Cách làm kem trắng da không phải là khó , sau đây là công thức kem trộn trắng da toàn thân dể dàng và đơn giản , bạn có thể làm tại nhà. Trí nhở tốt là mon muốn của hầu hết mọi người , vậy làm thế nào để có trí nhớ tốt ? Có nhiều cách đơn giản giúp bạn làm được điều đó. Giảm cân hiện nay đang là một xu hướng của mọi người , đặc biệt là phái nữ. Để giảm cân cấp tốc 1 tuần không quá khó, nên có một chế độ tập luyện và ăn uống một cách khoa học và có lộ trình sẽ giảm cân được. Gan là bộ phận giúp cơ thể lóc các độc tốt torng cơ thể , uống gì mát gan đẹp da ? Có nhiều thức uống không chỉ giúp đẹp da mà còn giúp mát gan.

Fire Ball said...

Đang tìm siêu thị điện máy cũ ở tphcm? Nếu bạn đang cần máy lạnh cũ tiết kiệm điện, máy giặt nội địa nhật hcm, hay tìm nơi mua bán tủ lạnh cũ tphcm thì hãy ghé qua thằng ghờm shop nhé. Đến với chúng tôi bạn sẽ được phục vụ chu đáo tận tình. Chúng tôi sẽ giải đáp cho bạn thắc mắc bạn gặp phải... Nếu có nhu cầu cần đến điện máy cũ hay đã qua sử dụng, hãy nhớ đến chúng tôi.

Bạn cần cập nhật các kiến thức như fa là gì, thẻ ghi nợ là gì, deep web là gì hãy ghé qua chuyên mục kiến thức tổng hợp để bổ sung kiến thức cho mình nhé.