Earlier this week, Joe Nocera wrote a puff piece on Karen Petrou of Federal Financial Analytics. In the piece, Nocera and Petrou repeat a frequently-heard — but nevertheless exceedingly superficial — argument that has always bothered me. From Nocera’s NYT column:
[Petrou] also points to a contradiction in the way the Too Big to Fail institutions are being dealt with. On the one hand, Dodd-Frank is very clear that if a big bank becomes insolvent, there can be no taxpayer bailout. It must be wound down, just like any other bank. Yet, at the same time, she says, the federal and international regulators are adding a host of special Too Big to Fail capital requirements and rules. “They are acting as if these institutions are still too big to fail. The two thrusts are incompatible.”Oy. This is not a contradiction. Applying additional capital requirements and more stringent regulations to certain large financial institutions is absolutely not incompatible with ending Too Big to Fail — or with Dodd-Frank’s new resolution authority for large financial institutions.
The new resolution authority makes is easier for large financial institutions (known as SIFIs) to fail, which is the exact opposite of “acting as if these institutions are still too big to fail.” Moreover, the additional capital requirements and regulations for SIFIs in no way contradict the resolution authority. The purpose of the additional capital requirements and enhanced prudential regulations for SIFIs is to make it less likely that a SIFI will fail. The purpose of the resolution authority is to make sure that when a SIFI fails, it can do so without bringing down the entire financial system. These are not contradictory — they’re complementary.
These are pretty basic concepts of financial reform — I wrote a post way back in October 2009, before Congress even took up the financial reform bill, explaining how a SIFI regime and a new resolution authority would fit together. The fact that so many financially-focused pundits have yet to move beyond the “hey, if they’re ‘systemically important’ they must be TBTF!”-level of analysis is just sad.
Posts
26 comments:
great post. a very simple yet widely misunderstood concept
Excellent post and blog -- thank you. This exact same Nocera paragraph left me scratching my head as well. You point is well taken that the recent crop of regulations aimed at systemically important institutions are in theory designed to make failure less likely; they may also (by raising the cost of engaging in certain types of business) encourage the SI Too Complex To Fail financial services companies to exit or divest some of their businesses.
You know something is working when TCTFs start reporting ROEs dropping from 30% to 5%. Hmmm, deleveraging anyone?
funny how of all of DF one could argue that the additional capital requirements could be the biggest long term impact, yet concepts like this garner no comments.
just goes to show how little people truly understand and they just want to yell angrily on the comment board of someones blog.
Yes, this makes good sense. There is nothing indeed incompatible between additional regulations and ending too big to fail. It just seems kind of obvious!
That's about like saying that buying fire insurance on your house and installing a sprinkler system are incompatible.
care to explain squeaky? or do you just like to make dumb analogies without putting thought into them?
Fire insurance won't prevent your house from burning down. Ending too-big-to-fail won't prevent banks from failing.
A sprinkler system may prevent your house from burning down. Higher capital requirements may keep banks from failing.
Git it/
"the additional capital requirements and regulations for SIFIs . . . The purpose of the additional capital requirements and enhanced prudential regulations for SIFIs is to make it less likely that a SIFI will fail. The purpose of the resolution authority is to make sure that when a SIFI fails, it can do so without bringing down the entire financial system. These are not contradictory — they’re complementary."
I'm not going to defend Nocera's peculiar brand of fuzzy thinking in a column he clearly hacked out, but I see a contradiction, or two or three.
The major one is between wanting the banking industry (and financial sector generally) to become profitable and solvent, on the one hand, and wanting the financial sector to become less predatory and toxic to the global economy, on the other.
Increasing capital requirements is a lovely thought, but it entails paying a return on that capital, which, in turn, entails exploiting some economic rent in the operation of financial businesses. The big five, six or seven financial institutions in the U.S. enjoy an economic rent from sheer size and power, and the special claims on gov't backing that come with size and systemic importance. Unfortunately, these advantages are offset by considerable diseconomies of scope, and now also the diseconomies of special requirements imposed under D-F.
Most of Nocera's column is about the bewildering complexity of the rule-making. There's a basic contradiction between the neoliberal vision of a principles-based supervision aimed at improving executive governance (transparency! integrity!) and the kind of rules-based, financial repression, which might actually reduce the burden of financial predation, and with it the scope for banking profits, and which would require breaking up the giant, universal banks into much smaller, strategically diverse and economically efficient units.
no squeaky I don't get it.... and I don't think you do either.
TBTF wasn't meant to end TBTF it was meant to force those companies to raise additional capital buffers so that they can better weather adverse environments.
SIFI's on the other hand are meant to designate which companies should have stricter oversight.
do you get it now?
The purpose of this blog new authority for resolution small business.additional finance capital most impotent discussion in your exclusive blog its too great
Thank you for the post, pretty helpful info.
Superb write-up in addition to web site -- appreciate it. That similar Nocera Cheap RS Goldpassage quit me personally scratch our head at the same time. Anyone position will be well obtained that the current harvest of polices aimed towards systemically significant companies are usually in theory meant to help to make malfunction lower the probability that; they might in addition (simply by increasing the expense of starting particular sorts of company) encourage the Cuando Far too Sophisticated To help Don't succeed fiscal providers firms to Buy WOW Gold help leave or divest a selection of their corporations.
Thank you! I didn't know they picked up on it until I saw your comment.
All vehicle, light truck and SUV suppliers have already been mandated to possess this technique installed in their cars because 1996. When troubles vci2 scania tester with the vehicle's systems take place the on-board pc generates a code to let the driver diagnose the issue. This code is often read by connecting and OBDii scan tool towards the vehicle's laptop or computer.
Also, you will find over 40 food stalls promoting seafood, ethnic food and everything in between.
Medicinal marijuana was also utilised in ancient China. China's oldest identified pharmacological Chinese Style perform described marijuana preparations to treat circumstances from constipation to malaria.
All vehicle, light truck and SUV suppliers have already been mandated to possess this technique installed in their cars because 1996. diablo 3 gold
Thats a little unusual.
yemek tarifleri
ekol hoca
android market
twitter aç
It is really natural looking article . It helpful for me.
alternative investments retail investors
Thank you for the great resources and content! It really makes sense.
Looking for resume templates?
interview questions and answer
The best resume templates
Truly remarkable labor with the blog. I do like your inflexible service and will wait for more post from you as post gave me gratification and gives some helps to do same work right here. Thanks a lot.Private equity Placement
The something we all know for specific is the fact it will windows anytime upgrade key eventually proceed Microsoft's record of picking puzzling names for its NT windows 7 home premium product key line of operating units. At times deliberately.
It takes strength to build for the future Diablo 3 Power Leveling, it takes strength to be polite to someone when that person has been rude to you Diablo 3 PowerLeveling, it takes strength to build for the future Diablo iii PowerLeveling.
The consequences of today are determined by the actions of the past scarlet blade gold. To change your future, alter your decisions today scarlet blade gold, Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards scarlet blade gold, but it takes character to keep you there.
Post a Comment